Web Site Content

Registered users

OpenNet Initiative Releases Results!

ONI ogoThe OpenNet Initiative has just released the findings of its first global study of Internet filtering at St. Anne’s College at the University of Oxford; the culmination of five years of work and the first report of its kind.  It was the first public conference on Internet filtering hosted by the ONI -- with major assistance from the staff of the Oxford Internet Institute.

After ONI Research Director Rob Faris and Principal Investigator Ron Deibert presented the data, the ONI team solicited comments and questions from the audience of over 100 human rights activists, journalists, technologists, academics.  They discussed ways in which the communities in the room and around the world could use the findings to further their own research and advocacy.

The conference also marked the launch of the new ONI website that, in addition to several new functions, will host forty country profiles, eight regional overviews, and much more.

*You can find the latest coverage of the OpenNet Initiative and their findings from the San Jose Mercury News, BBC, Businessweek, MIT Technology Review, International Herald Tribune, IT News, Slashdot, and Digg.

Access Denied

The Practice and Policy of Global Internet Filtering
Edited by Ronald J. Deibert, John G. Palfrey, Rafal Rohozinski and Jonathan Zittrain

Access DeniedMany countries around the world block or filter Internet content, denying access to information--often about politics, but also relating to sexuality, culture, or religion--that they deem too sensitive for ordinary citizens. Access Denied documents and analyzes Internet filtering practices in over three dozen countries, offering the first rigorously conducted study of an accelerating trend.

Internet filtering takes place in over two dozens states worldwide including many countries in Asia and the Middle East and North Africa. Related Internet content control mechanisms are also in place in Canada, the United States and a cluster of countries in Europe. Drawing on a just-completed survey of global Internet filtering undertaken by the OpenNet Initiative (a collaboration of the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard Law School, the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto, the Oxford Internet Institute at Oxford University, and the University of Cambridge) and relying on work by regional experts and an extensive network of researchers, Access Denied examines the political, legal, social, and cultural contexts of Internet filtering in these states from a variety of perspectives. Chapters discuss the mechanisms and politics of Internet filtering, the strengths and limitations of the technology that powers it, the relevance of international law, ethical considerations for corporations that supply states with the tools for blocking and filtering, and the implications of Internet filtering for activist communities that increasingly rely on Internet technologies for communicating their missions.

Reports on Internet content regulation in forty different countries follow, with each country profile outlining the types of content blocked by category and documenting key findings.

Contributors:
Ross Anderson, Malcolm Birdling, Ronald Deibert, Robert Faris, Vesselina Haralampieva, Steven Murdoch, Helmi Noman, John Palfrey, Rafal Rohozinski, Mary Rundle, Nart Villeneuve, Stephanie Wang, and Jonathan Zittrain

Ronald Deibert is Associate Professor of Political Science and Director of the Citizen Lab at the Munk Centre for Internet Studies, University of Toronto.

John Palfrey is Executive Director of the Berkman Center for Internet and Society and Clinical Professor of Law at Harvard Law School.

Rafal Rohozinski is a Research Fellow of the Cambridge Security Program and Director of the Advanced Network Research Group at Cambridge University.

Jonathan Zittrain is Professor of Internet Governance and Regulation at Oxford University and Jack N. and Lillian R. Berkman Visiting Professor for Entrepreneurial Legal Studies at Harvard Law School.

 

Check it out: Wired News, "A Sneak Peak at a Fractured Web"

Onimap
Last week members of the OpenNet Initiative convened at Berkman to review its research findings before setting to work on a comprehensive, annual study it will publish this spring. The OpenNet Initiative (ONI) is a joint collaborative project between the University of Toronto, Cambridge University, Oxford University, and Harvard Law School. Mark Anderson interviewed five ONI researchers, including Helmi Noman, Elijah Zarwan, Nart Villeneuve, and Stephen Murdoch. From the article:

The spectrum of internet censorship, the researchers found, ranged from transparent to utterly murky. Perhaps the country with the most accessible filtering system was Saudi Arabia, said Berkman Center research affiliate Helmi Noman. "On their website, they have all the information of why they block and what they block," he said. "And they invite contributions (of other sites to be blocked) from the public."

Vietnam, on the other hand, floats decoys. As ONI first documented this summer and confirmed in this year's study, the Southeast Asian regime purports to censor sexually explicit content. But ONI's computers found no such blocking in place. They did find, however, plenty of unadvertised censorship of political and religious websites critical of the country's one-party state.

Sometimes a censoring government tries to conceal its filtering behind spoofed web-browser error messages. ONI discovered that Tunisia, for instance, masks filtered pages by serving a mockup of Internet Explorer's 404 error page. These supposed error pages stood out, because ONI doesn't use IE. "Rather than getting a page that says 'This page has been blocked,' you get a page saying 'Page not found,' designed to look exactly like the Internet Explorer 404 page," said Cairo-based ONI consultant Elijah Zarwan.

Sometimes a censoring government apparently dips into the bag of tricks more commonly used by online extortionists and script kiddies. ONI researcher Stephen Murdoch of Cambridge University points to denial of service (or DoS) attacks on multiple opposition-party websites preceding countrywide elections in both Belarus and Kyrgyzstan.

Blogs empower non-state actors in the Arab world to speak and be heard

September 1, 2006

Excerpts from the report:

Gulfnews

Blogging has added a new dimension to political discussion. This is especially the case in the fair share of anonymity.

According to Helmi Noman, a Fulbright scholar who researches internet usage in the Arab world, the power which was monopolised by states before the internet age is now rapidly eroding in the Arab world as citizens create and disseminate information.

Noman contends, "The internet has led to the abandonment of state-controlled media."

Full article from Gulf News.

Internet in the Arab World: A Catalyst for Power Shift

April 5, 2006

Berkman Center for Internet & SocietyIn a talk yesterday at Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet and Society, Helmi Noman  discussed how the Internet is creating an emerging information paradigm which democratizes access to information and liberates users from the control of content providers. These changes include ways in which the unprecedented access to information offered by the Internet empowers Arab Internet users and defies the social and political structures in the Arab world; issues surrounding state filtering systems; and the potential systemic changes which cyberspace will bring to real space in the Arab world.